Auditor time moved from searching to judgement.
0
weeks from start to formal handover
0%
of conclusions carry their quotation and source
0
working product, handed over with user guide and roadmap
The situation
Comparing a regulatory rulebook against a client’s internal manuals means hundreds of individual judgements — and most of the time goes on reading, searching and matching before any judgement is possible. Expensive reviewer hours were going on retrieval, not on the judgement itself.
Where we started
The first workflow was one chapter of one rulebook, reviewed the old way and the new way side by side — same reviewer, same documents, both results on the table. That comparison was the whole argument: the searching disappeared, the judgement stayed, and every conclusion now carried its quotation.
Only after that chapter held up did the review widen to the full rulebook.
What we built
A review process that organises the documents, narrows to the requirements that actually apply, and connects each one to the policy text that covers it — keeping the quotation and source behind every conclusion.
How it runs now
The outcome
A working product, demonstrated to a partner and formally handed over with a user guide and a deployment roadmap — six weeks from start. Reviewer time moved from searching to judgement.
“Every conclusion belongs to the reviewer. The system just puts the evidence in front of them.”
Evidence
WORKING PRODUCT · DEMONSTRATED 2026 · HANDOVER DOCUMENTED
NO CLIENT NAMES, NO CLIENT FINDINGS — BY DESIGN